Skip to main content

Net vs Brick-and-Mortar

A market battle is raging NOW between brick-and-mortar stores (Walmart)
& the net (Amazon).


I suppose the perception is such that an internet store can do it better, have a broader
selection & be more responsive to the needs of the consumer. It’s possible that the
internet store is more convenient & easier to use. Plus, maybe less expensive.


The struggle for the internet store is that they have to figure out how to get the product to the
end user …. the “last mile” they would say. Shipping costs can be significant. I recall not too
long ago, planning on purchasing a product, where it was being offered something like this
… “Buy 1, Get 2nd FREE”, the only thing needed to pay on the second one was shipping
& handling. The free turned out not to be so free, therefore I couldn’t even buy the first
one because of the shipping/handling cost.


The collection of sales taxes used to be a big deal, but that is quickly disappearing as an
issue & the playing field is being leveled.


Now comes the REAL big deal. The brick-and-mortar stores have actual buildings …. Rent,
electricity etc … huge overhead costs. They need to sell products at a price that allows them
to pay those costs. Thus, putting down a floor beyond which it’s difficult to go thru.


My thoughts about all of this came about after purchasing some items from Walmart.


My family actually ordered the items online (groceries) & then we went to pick them
up using their Walmart Pickup service. We ordered the items, they texted us telling us that
they were ready for pick up, We texted them back telling them we  were on the way
& amazingly enough they have a pleasant person come out to our car give us the items,
explain what they were out of stock on, provide us suitable replacements. This service was incredible.


Walmart beat the internet sellers by sharing the costs of shipping for the last mile. We (consumer)
assumed that responsibility & picked the items up. Similar to gas stations from yesteryear.
Walmart used their store as an advantage as opposed to a liability, not a burdensome cost.
Clever.


Way to go Walmart!!! They are bridging the internet & brick-and-mortar gap ever
so nicely.

Hey, Amazon … it’s not going to be a walk in the park on your trip to global domination :)

Comments

  1. Strange to hear someone say something positive about Walmart ☺️

    ReplyDelete
  2. One has to be fair about it ... if I am going to dish out the bad when I experience it, I have to be ready to express the good when I see it, also :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the NFL & Money (No right or wrong)

Here is my take ... It has been reported that Athletes participating in the league will most likely be susceptible to suffering from CTE and other lingering injuries playing the game. Do note, that many parents are becoming less likely to encourage their children (unless it is the only way out of their socioeconomic status) to play football because of those injuries. The NFL is not expected to stop playing the game because of this harm. Could it be they fear the loss of money and status? Recently, the NFL was shocked by the trend associated with “Colin Kaepernick”  protesting American political and social issues by refusing to honor the playing of the “Star Spangled Banner.” Once again, money was and is the issue here. We have no idea of what the owners of the NFL are thinking because whatever they decided to do was to make sure fans continued to watch and attend football games. Revenue from ticket sales and television viewing is a pretty big deal. Recent relocations of several N

Our Current Political Leaders are a DISGRACE

This current batch of political leaders are most disingenuous ... thus, disgracing their elevated leadership status. Perhaps, referring to them as such is a little strong .... nevertheless, it may NOT be too far off the mark. If any of our elected leaders truly cared about a solution to the immigration problem, then at this very moment we would be talking about workable solutions instead of blaming each other for the lack thereof. The images we are being presented with regarding detention of children are simply put forth to elicit emotional outbursts as opposed to serving as a basis for generating solutions to the overall problem of illegal immigration and border security. Once again, the defenseless  (in this case the most helpless of all ... children) are getting hurt and are no more than political pawns. Hey!!! Washington ... these defenseless folks have families, breath, blood and emotions. Management types in business, will tell the minions ... that if we are not part of

Robert De Niro's "72nd Tony Awards" "F-bomb" Tirade

Pretty scary stuff ..... and I'm also a little shocked by the rousing applause to go along with it. The icing on the cake came with a comment by the playwright, "Tony Kushner" (backstage supporting and listening to Mr. De Niro) denouncing the Trump presidency by referring to it as "the Hitler mistake." Normally, the safest course of action when threatening behavior rears its ugly head is to move as far away as one can possibly get. At times it has been necessary for me to run in the opposite direction when faced with .... 1. Individuals in a state of rage (angry). 2. Those that exhibit racial hatred and/or hatred of any kind. 3. Unsavory locker room talk, and .... 4. Physical violence. In a free society, Mr De Niro has the right to express himself politically as he wishes. Perhaps that is the underlying message regarding the standing "O" ... not necessarily standing to support his opinion, but his right to have one and openly express it. LOL